Trevor, a student in my Multimedia Software class, came into class on Monday bubbling with excitement about what he had been doing with jQuery and the HTML 5 Canvas over the weekend. I didn't have to twist his arm to get him to share with the rest of us, and he became the teacher for the day. The rest of the class watched and listened to their classmate with heightened interest. It was a wonderful class.
It is obvious that Trevor likes what he is doing. You can clearly see that he is having fun. He is expressing himself, and the skills he is gaining are amazing. Since his motivation comes from within himself, there is no stopping him. I don't have to worry that Trevor will be a life long learner, or that he will have an active and rewarding intellectual life ahead of him.
It happened again in the following class, when Mica arrived wanting to share what she had taught herself over the weekend. She had read ahead in the book we are using to learn Python programming, and she was eager to show the program she had written applying what she had learned. It filled me with joy to see her presenting her program. It is for opportunities like these that I'm glad I'm a teacher.
Mid week I had the opposite experience. I was giving a mini "formative assessment" - three multiple choice and fill-in questions designed to help me figure out if the students in class could recognize the data types I had introduced them to the previous day. Despite my instructions for students to "work on their own and not share information with anyone else in class", I caught a few of the students "cheating" on the assessment.
I was upset by this and made the students aware of my feelings in no uncertain terms. I almost never give assessments of this type, but I thought in this case it would be useful in helping me determine whether to move forward or to have activities to reinforce concepts not yet understood by the class. The actions of the students who "cheated" had made the results useless, and the whole exercise a waste of time.
I know why the students did what they did. They are just playing the game they've been taught to play by experience in school. Learning isn't the point, getting the "score" is what matters. I had put them into a situation with which they were clearly familiar, and they were acting the way they have learned to act in similar circumstances. In the words of Thomas Huxley:
They work to pass, not to know; and outraged Science takes her revenge. They do pass, and they don't know.I was upset because I work so hard to make sure that what happened on Wednesday can't happen. I design assessments that are individualized and project based, and I tell students that it is absolutely OK that they share and help each other out, as long as they can discuss intelligently everything they present as their work at the end of the process.
I won't give up on trying these mini "traditional assessments" with the class. After I explain to them that I won't be averaging the grades, and will only use the results for feedback on how to set up a more effective learning experience for them, and as supportive evidence of competency attainment, then I bet I can get them to treat the assessments with the right attitude and to refrain from the impulse to game the system.
I actively resist standardized testing, and the impersonal, dehumanizing effects it has on student's love of learning. I will continue to actively resist harming students in my work as a teacher for as long as I am a teacher.
Sadly, I've seen increased pressure on teachers in the last few years to think of preparing students to take these educationally harmful instruments as their main duty, the one on which their job performance will be measured. As Thomas Huxley put it more than a century and a half ago,
Examination, like fire, is a good servant, but a bad master; and there seems to me to be some danger of its becoming our master.While I don't pretend to know exactly where this drive toward standardized testing and "data driven" evaluation of students and schools is coming from, it is not hard to image some of the causes. There are huge sums of money to be made by the companies producing and administering all these tests, and if children have to be harmed in the process, we can't let that get in the way of profits.
Progressive educator friends of mine tell me that when President Obama chose Arne Duncan over Linda Darling Hammond for Secretary of Education, he sent a clear message that under his administration, the Corporatocracy would be firmly in control of education policy. We teachers are feeling the effects of this control in our schools today.
The day that I am told that preparing students for a meaningless and harmful standardized test has to replace striving to make my classroom a place where creativity and love of learning are celebrated is the day I will need to leave the classroom. I hope that day is not near, but I fear that it may be.